What comes first depends on what your agency is responsible for
A statewide program, a municipal court with no technology staff, and the team who will maintain the system in year three are not solving the same problem. Each page below sets out that situation, the work that usually comes first, and a first engagement that can be bought on its own.
The agencies
The names here are the US ones. The descriptions are written around what the body does: sets direction for courts it does not directly control, holds the record, runs the counter, inherits the system and maintains it in year three. A courts service, a ministry of justice, or a provincial court services division will find its own function described under a different name.
State Court Systems
We support statewide programs, where one decision has to work in the largest court and in the smallest one at the same time.
Usually starts with Readiness and Modernization Roadmap.
Local and Municipal Courts
Small courts carry full caseloads without dedicated technology staff. Our engagements are sized so a small court can buy them and absorb them.
Usually starts with Readiness and Modernization Roadmap.
Administrative Offices of the Courts
Your office sets direction for courts it does not directly control. We plan and build programs designed to be adopted.
Usually starts with Readiness and Modernization Roadmap.
Clerks and Justice Agencies
Your office holds the record: filings, fees, dockets, and the counter where the public meets the justice system.
Usually starts with Readiness and Modernization Roadmap.
Government Technology Departments
Your team inherits every system the agency buys. We deliver systems your own staff can integrate, maintain, and run.
Usually starts with Build.
One of these is a role rather than an agency type
The person running an agency's AI program does not search by agency type. They search for the job: what a readiness picture should contain, what an AI use policy has to cover, which project to pilot first. The role also arrives in agencies of every size, sometimes as a full-time appointment and sometimes as a portfolio handed to a deputy, so organizing that page by agency would put the same reader in five places.
For AI and Innovation Leaders
You were hired to build an AI program from nothing, usually without engineers. We provide the readiness evidence, the policy, and the first working project.
What is genuinely hard is not the policy language. It is knowing which of your systems could support any of it, which data is clean enough to use, and which project to do first so that the first one works.
Where an engagement usually starts
Each of these is bought on its own, with a written scope, and stopping after it is a normal outcome that costs nothing later. Where a price has not been committed to yet, the page says so rather than showing a number we would have to revise.
Readiness and Modernization Roadmap
We interview your staff, review your systems and data, and deliver a modernization plan your agency can act on: what to do first, what it costs, and what it depends on.
Usually the first step for State Court Systems, Local and Municipal Courts, Administrative Offices of the Courts, Clerks and Justice Agencies, For AI and Innovation Leaders.
- Price
- From $18,000
- Timeline
- 6 to 8 weeks
Build
We design and build websites, portals, applications, and integrations under a written scope, with source code in your repository from the first commit.
Usually the first step for Government Technology Departments.
- Price
- From $60,000
- Timeline
- 8 to 20 weeks
The safe first step
The readiness assessment is free, takes about 20 minutes, and returns a scored report you keep. It creates no obligation, no call, and no follow-up.